Banks buy up carbon permits

16 Oct, 2012 09:04 AM
Comments
3
 

MAJOR banks are offering to buy some of the 27 million carbon permits given to Australia's biggest emitters by the federal government, as companies look to increase cash flow or pay off higher electricity costs.

According to The Australian Financial Review, at least four banks – Commonwealth Bank of Australia, National Australia Bank, Macquarie and Westpac – are looking to snap up the free permits given to emissions intensive trade exposed companies at rates higher than available through the government. The companies can then buy them back at their full price when they need to pay off their carbon liabilities next year.

The purchase is, in effect, a corporate loan and the price of the permits reflects a company's credit risk; margins range from 150 to 400 basis points. In contrast, the government applies a fixed discount rate if businesses want to sell permits back early.

"Businesses can potentially do better elsewhere, and indeed, what's happening is that some trade exposed businesses are looking to the banks," Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said.

"The recent activity is evidence that the scheme is operating as it was designed," a Westpac spokeswoman said.

"Westpac is one of a number of banks supporting companies in the market and we see this as an important part of our role as a financial market intermediary."

So far, free permits worth $620 million have been allocated to 12 trade-exposed companies.

A spokesman for Climate Change Minister Greg Combet said as the carbon market continued to develop, the government expected such secondary financial products would expand and increase carbon market liquidity

"These permits cover both direct emissions the companies are liable for but also electricity cost increases which are passed through the electricity market," the spokesman said.

"Accordingly, assisted firms were always expected to trade permits to offset their electricity costs."

But Greens leader Christine Milne said it was evidence the government handouts were "too generous".

"If these companies, which lobbied so hard for more permits, were worried about the price on pollution, they'd be saving the free permits, not selling them," Senator Milne said.

Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt said while banks were looking to make money from the carbon tax, it all "added up to higher electricity prices".

Meanwhile, the secretary of the Department of Climate Change has offered a lukewarm endorsement of Treasury's prediction of a $29 carbon price by 2015.

Giving evidence to a Senate estimates inquiry on Monday, Blair Comley said the decision by the government to link to the European emissions scheme and place a cap on the use of so-called "Kyoto units" by Australian companies of 12.5 percent of total liability, made it "more likely" the Treasury modelling was correct.

He said it was not "inconceivable" that the price in 2015 could be $50 and highlighted actions the European Union was looking to take to bolster its emissions trading scheme.

"When you look at what the Treasury modelling was trying to do, it is still the best information we have available," Mr Comley said. "You are talking about a price which is three years away. There are reasonable arguments that [$29] is not an implausible estimate in 2015."

He also said placing a limit of 12.5 per cent on Kyoto permits would limit the downside in the domestic price of carbon.

"If anything, I would describe the 12.5 per cent cap [as] meaning the likely price path forecast by the Treasury modelling is actually more likely than it otherwise would be."

Page:
1
The Australian Financial ReviewSource: http://www.afr.com
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Love the country
16/10/2012 8:05:11 PM

Let the banks buy carbon credits, but farmers don't sell them....keep your land, don't sell or lock it away from your family for 100 years. Have been to meetings regarding carbon credits, don't be fooled, farmers won't win.
itwasntlongago
17/10/2012 6:36:30 AM

What happens if these "big emmitters" can't pay back their carbon liabilities next year? Do they close down? What do the banks do with the very expensive pieces of paper which were printed by our government, gifted to the emmitters and effectively used as collateral to borrow money from the banks? How does this happen and how does this help the environment? Why are our banks speculating in such risky activities? What has our government promised them? Smells similar to the sub-prime loans pre GFC era, this time backed by our wonderful government. Hard to embrace the future with this rubbish.
Dirty Harry
17/10/2012 7:55:17 AM

Carbon markets are fleecing markets.And we the people will be the ones fleeced, and it won't change the climate one bit.

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
seems to me that many on this site are NOT opposed to Davids proposals. I'am obviously part of
light grey arrow
there is no intellectual rigour in such topics bushie, have u not learnt I do not trust the
light grey arrow
Haven't seen a disallowance motion for subsidised meals and alcohol for parliamentarians yet.